Adaptive Computer Games: Easing the Authorial Burden

Game designers usually create AI behaviors by writing scripts that describe the reactions to all imaginable circumstances within the confines of the game world. The AI Programming Wisdom series provides a good overview of current scripting techniques used in the game industry. Scripting is expensive and it’s hard to plan. So, behaviors could be repetitive (resulting in breaking the atmosphere) or behaviors could fail to achieve their desired purpose. On one hand, creating AI with a rich behavior set requires a great deal of engineering effort on the part of game developers. On the other hand, the rich and dynamic nature of game worlds makes it hard to imagine and plan for all possible scenarios. When behaviors fail to achieve their desired purpose, the game AI is unable to identify such failure and will continue executing them. The techniques described in this article specifically deal with these issues.

Behavior (or script) creation for computer games typically involves two steps: a) generating a first version of behaviors using a programming language, b) debugging and adapting the behavior via experimentation. In this article we present techniques that aim at assisting the author from carrying out these two steps manually: behavior learning and behavior adaptation.

In the behavior learning process, the game developers can specify the AI behavior by demonstrating it to the system instead of having to code the behavior using a programming language. The system extracts behaviors from these expert demonstrations and stores them. Then, at performance time, the system retrieves appropriate behaviors observed from the expert and revises them in response to the current situation it is dealing with (i.e., to the current game state).

In the behavior adaptation process, the system monitors the performance of these learned behaviors at runtime. The system keeps track of the status of the executing behaviors, infer from their execution trace what might be wrong, and perform appropriate adaptations to the behaviors once the game is over. This approach to behavior transformation enables the game AI to reflect on the issues in the learnt behaviors from expert demonstration and revises them after post analysis of things that went wrong during the game. These set of techniques allow non-AI experts to define behaviors through demonstration that can then be adapted to different situations thereby reducing the development effort required to address all contingencies in a complex game.

Read the paper:

Adaptive Computer Games: Easing the Authorial Burden

by Manish Mehta, Santi Ontañón, Ashwin Ram

AI Game Programming Wisdom 4 (AIGPW4), Steve Rabin (editor), Charles River Media, 2008
www.cc.gatech.edu/faculty/ashwin/papers/er-08-03.pdf
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: